Unfolding Dualities and Pressures in Typologies

A Natural Relationship

The unfolding dualities in Typologies are explicitly developmental and cyclic, and they must surely link to developmental sequence that has become evident in the psychosocial pressures.

In the unfolding dialectic, the thesis is the essence of the method and it emerges the moment a method is used. It has now been found that the essence of any method is generated by the 1° pressure.

The antithesis is the developmental force that typically arises in association with use of the method. The use of any method has been found to be generated by the 2° pressure.

The combination of the dialectic and the pressures for each Principal Typology is laid out below. Links are provided to assist in checking the propositions.

A Proposed Process

For any particular Type, the 1° pressure supports the method's thesis because that thesis constitutes the Type's essence and existence.

During use of that method, the 2° pressure becomes spontaneously operative without necessarily activating the antithesis.

The antithesis may be activated by intellectual reflection, through exigencies of everyday use and accompanying social criticism, or by a positive desire to improve or develop the method.

An activated antithesis, regardless of its origin, will always depend on the drive provided by the 2° pressure.

As that drive intensifies and the antithesis receives increasing attention, a tension develops with the thesis. Sometimes the two poles can be combined to get the best of both, but often that is impossible—see examples here—and that results in evident social polarization and public controversy.

Nevertheless, the tension can be resolved theoretically, and sometimes actually, via a synthesis that constitutes the thesis of the Type at the next level up.

Because such a synthesis depends crucially on the previous 2° pressure for its formation and maintenance, that drive becomes the new 1° pressure driving the new thesis.

This process repeats itself at each level of the Typology until the synthesis and 2° pressure at L'7 becomes the thesis and 1°pressure at L'1, completing the cycle.

Review the Typologies

PH'1-Decision Methods

Check uD. Check pressures.

Method Thesis sets Essence Antithesis follows Use
L'1-Rationalist Prioritization
driven by
Autonomy
Evaluation
driven by
Certainty

L'2-Empiricist

Optimization
driven by
Certainty
Experimention
driven by
Performance
L'3-Pragmatist Satisficing
driven by
Performance
Dynamism
driven by
Understanding

L'4-Dialectic

Compromise
driven by
Understanding
Mediation
driven by
Acceptability
L'5-Systemicist Strategy
driven by
Acceptability
Modelling
driven by
Selflesness

L'6-Structuralist

Accountability
driven by
Selflesness
Reorganization
driven by
Well-Being
L'7-Imaginist Inspiration
driven by
Well-Being
Counselling
driven by
Autonomy

PH'2-Research Methods

Check uD. Check pressures.

Method Thesis sets Essence Antithesis follows Use
L'1-Empirical Facts
driven by
Autonomy
Validation
driven by
Certainty

L'2-Analytic

Conclusions
driven by
Certainty
Doubts
driven by
Performance
L'3-Explanatory Conjectures
driven by
Performance
Refutations
driven by
Understanding

L'4-Dialectic

Opposition
driven by
Understanding
Reconciliation
driven by
Acceptability
L'5-Holistic Structure
driven by
Acceptability
Prediction
driven by
Selflesness

L'6-Formal

Assumptions
driven by
Selflesness
Challenges
driven by
Well-Being
L'7-Contemplative Speculation
driven by
Well-Being
Rejection
driven by
Autonomy

PH'3- Depiction Methods

Check uD. Check pressures.

Method Thesis sets Essence Antithesis follows Use
L'1-Dynamic Interaction
driven by
Autonomy
Entanglement
driven by
Certainty

L'2-Atomistic

Boundaries
driven by
Certainty
Idiosyncrasy
driven by
Performance
L'3-Causal Impact
driven by
Performance
Multiplicity
driven by
Understanding

L'4-Dualistic

Division
driven by
Understanding
Polarization
driven by
Acceptability
L'5-Unified Integration
driven by
Acceptability
Co-evolution
driven by
Selflesness

L'6-Structural

Framework
driven by
Selflesness
Functioning
driven by
Well-Being
L'7-Unitary Totalization
driven by
Well-Being
Domination
driven by
Autonomy

PH'4-Stabilization Methods

Check uD. Check pressures.

Method Thesis sets Essence Antithesis follows Use
L'1-Sensory Receptivity
driven by
Autonomy
Activity
driven by
Certainty

L'2-Vital

Instinctual
functioning
driven by
Certainty
Symbolic
functioning
driven by
Performance
L'3-Emotional Bodily States
driven by
Performance
Mental States
driven by
Understanding

L'4-Individual

The Self
driven by
Understanding
Others
driven by
Acceptability
L'5-Relational Group
driven by
Acceptability
Individuality
driven by
Selflesness

L'6-Social

Role
driven by
Selflesness
Situations
driven by
Well-Being
L'7-Transpersonal Soul
driven by
Well-Being
God
driven by
Autonomy

PH'5-Language Use Methods

Check uD. Check pressures.

Method Thesis sets Essence Antithesis follows Use
L'1-Dynamic Instruction
driven by
Autonomy
Connection
driven by
Certainty

L'2-Atomistic

Allusion
driven by
Certainty
Indication
driven by
Performance
L'3-Causal Definition
driven by
Performance
Generalization
driven by
Understanding

L'4-Dualistic

Convention
driven by
Understanding
Intensification
driven by
Acceptability
L'5-Unified Evocation
driven by
Acceptability
Distillation
driven by
Selflesness

L'6-Structural

Formula
driven by
Selflesness
Patterning
driven by
Well-Being
L'7-Unitary Revelation
driven by
Well-Being
Interpretation
driven by
Autonomy

PH'6-Ethical Choice Methods

Check uD. Check pressures.

Method Thesis sets Essence Antithesis follows Use
L'1-Dynamic Solutions
driven by
Autonomy
Realities
driven by
Certainty

L'2-Atomistic

Continuity
driven by
Certainty
Change
driven by
Performance
L'3-Causal Ideals
driven by
Performance
Potentials
driven by
Understanding

L'4-Dualistic

Strengths
driven by
Understanding
Vulnerabilities
driven by
Acceptability
L'5-Unified Altruism
driven by
Acceptability
Egoism
driven by
Selflesness

L'6-Structural

Common Good
driven by
Selflesness
Individual Autonomy
driven by
Well-Being
L'7-Unitary Spirituality
driven by
Well-Being
Temporality
driven by
Autonomy

This completes the investigation.

Originally posted 31-Aug-2026.