Review: Determinants of Fitting In

Fitness as a Primal Need

When Darwin spoke of "survival of the fittest" he was not referring to physical fitness or strength. He was referring to «fitting in with the environment». That is the meaning of fitness here. Fitness is a survival issue at the biological level, and it deserves to be identified as a survival issue for psychosocial functioning.

Fitting in brings the dynamic duality of personal v social that pervades every dynamic Tree pattern into sharper focus. No functioning of any sort can take places without influence from the social dimension and social pressures.

What was not clear or insufficiently emphasized prior to this investigation is the way that fitting in is channeled through depiction-PH'3 and clarification-PH'3C. These activities are naturally dependent on the use of language-PH'5 and t is notable that the method in general use in society is universal-L'4 which does not demand precision or conviction, but merely consensus with an implicit feeling that mutual understanding is occurring regardless of whether this is the case.

PsychoSocial Pressures

It has been established that the Spiral reveals how the next higher Root Level and Domain influences the current Spiral Domain. See more here.

Cycle-1 essences generate the lower 4 Centres of the Tree and contribute their psychosocial pressures. As a group, they are dominated by acceptability, which is the overall psychosocial pressure of the Change Domain.

These Centres control any sustained progression-PsH3 (the Domain Field). Going along with change: i.e. level-1 performance is the concrete demand but all other Centres demand transcendence. Sharing the abstract impartial framework calls for selflessness, tolerating polarization calls for understanding, and effective adherence to the narrative calls for autonomy.

Cycle-2 essences generate the upper 3 Centres of the Tree and contribute their psychosocial pressures. These are dominated by a pressure for well-being, which is generated by the Experience Domain.

The effect is to make acceptability comfortable: and these pressures are actualizing in nature. Being acceptably practical, following reassuring standards (personal and social) and drawing on certain convictions will make a person comfortable about fitting-in—or lead them to refuse to fit in.


Further Frameworks

This Satellite is completed for now.

However, completing the investigation of Change calls for the discovery and development of several more frameworks.

In the Change Domain Fundamentals, the structural hierarchy containing the components for Changing Systems (PsH3) needs formulation. This would then be expected to generate a framework for a Sustained Progression (PsH3K), which is the field for any Definitive Stage (PH3K). Provisional formulations are in the Taxonomy Notes.

In the Change Domain Controls, the Spiral-derived structural hierarchy is expected to contain components for Ensuring Acceptability (PH'3CsH), which in turn generates a framework currently named Criticism of Clarifications (PH'3CsHK). Provisional formulations are in the Taxonomy Notes.

Finally there are 7 Q-Arenas of Fitting In, with each Arena requiring a set of frameworks. Provisional formulations, yet to be developed, will initially be posted in the Taxonomy Notes.

Originally posted: 1-May-2025.