Further Analyses of the Anchors

The Story so Far

Investigations in the previous topic have suggested the following characterisations:

Tetrad Generators
of Balance
Function in
Mobilizing Relationships
Equalization in Relations Threats Common
Criticisms
G44 Unite To bond with diverse others through offering sincere dependability. Communal
spirit
(Spiritual)
Social: Division
Personal: Arrogance
Unrealistic
Idealistic
G43 Collaborate To work jointly with others through pooling knowledge and efforts. Enterprising integration
(Intellectual)
Social: Distancing
Personal: Secrecy
Inefficient
Naive losses
G42 Oppose To maintain the integrity of a relationship through honest disagreement. Frank
acknowledgement
(Ethical)
Social: Discord
Personal: Dominance
Obstructive
Destructive
G41 Compromise To reach a mutually acceptable position through relinquishing something of value. Expedient harmonization
(Practical)
Social: Deadlock
Personal: Fixation
Weakness
Betrayal

Group Progression

The tetrads show a sequencing escalation from G41 to G44.

In equalizing relations, the move is:

  • from practical i.e. expedient harmonization in compromise-G41
  • to social-ethical i.e. frank acknowledgement in oppose-G42
  • to intellectual i.e. enterprising integration in collaborate-G43
  • to spiritual i.e. communal spirit in unite-G44.

This parallels the tetrads for organising thinking that divide up psychosocial reality as identified in the framework for Manifesting Character (PsH4G4). The typical criticisms parallel the nature of these psychosocial domains.

Escalation is also evident in the threats to balance and relating:

Personal:  fixation dominance secrecy arrogance
Social:  deadlock discord distancing division.

Internal Characteristics

Internal levels have similar effects in each group:

  • g1 provides the initiation: weakness here means no foundation.
    ClosedDetail

  • g2 involves principles: weakness here means a loss of integrity.
    ClosedDetail

  • g3 focuses on engagement: weakness here means a loss of intensity.
    ClosedDetail

  • g4 is about adaptability: weakness here means no sustenance.
    ClosedDetail

Oscillating Pattern

The triads indicated the possibility of an oscillating pattern:

G1-hoping involves assertion directed outwards to the socio-physical milieu and operating independently.

G2-determination involves assertion directed inwards to oneself but dependent on confirmation from others.

G3-endurance involves assertion directed outwards to the socio-physical milieu and operating independently.

It therefore might be expected that:

The drive to G4-mobilize relationships will involve assertion directed inwards to oneself while depending on social confirmation. Observation confirms that this is the case. Relating is a personal matter, but compromises must be confirmed by the counter-party, opposition must be confirmed as constructive, while collaboration and uniting cannot exist without the approval of others.


Transition

Having mobilized relationships and retained your balance, you are now in a position to use yourself to attempt the impossible.

"Yourself" refers to personal capabilities which includes anything under your control that could be useful. The issue here is that a person often fails to appreciate their own unique talents, skills and resources and so shrinks from the attempt.

Capabilities must be recognized if they are to be tapped to find a way to act on the impossible situation in which you find yourself.

It is possible to recognize capability by adding an additional adjacent level to form pentads that specify forms of drive.


Originally posted:  12-Jun-2026.