Further Analyses of the Preservers
Summary Table
Progression
The tetrads show a sequencing escalation.
In equalizing relations, the move is:
- from practical i.e. expedient harmonization in
- to social-ethical i.e. frank acknowledgement in
- to intellectual i.e. enterprising integration in
- to spiritual i.e. communal spirit in .
This parallels the tetrads for organising thinking that divide up psychosocial reality as identified in the framework for . The typical criticisms parallel the nature of these psychosocial domains.
Escalation is also evident in the threats:
Personal: fixation → dominance →secrecy →arrogance
Social: deadlock → discord → distancing → division.
Internal Characteristics
Internal levels have similar effects in each relationship preserver:
-
g1 provides the initiation: weakness here means no foundation.
Detail -
g2 involves principles: weakness here means a loss of integrity.
Detail -
g3 focuses on engagement: weakness here means a loss of intensity.
Detail -
g4 is about adaptability: weakness here means no sustenance.
Detail
Oscillating Pattern
The triads indicated the possibility of an oscillating pattern:
is a matter of personal assertion directed outwards to the socio-physical milieu.
is directed inwards to oneself but dependent on confirmation from others.
is a matter of personal assertion directed outwards to the socio-physical milieu.
It therefore might be expected that:
will be directed inwards to oneself while depending on social confirmation. Observation confirms that this is the case. Relating is a personal matter, but must be confirmed by the counter-party, must be confirmed as constructive, while and cannot exist without the approval of others.
More
Odd-Even Division:
The odd tetrads, and , have practical or external inhibitors of effectiveness, like what has to be given up or might be lost.
The even tetrads, and , have inner or personal inhibitors, of effectiveness, like fear and doubt.
is a feature of all four tetrads:
reliable for , because there can be no walking away
explicit when , because it must be clear you are an insider assisting the group and not an outsider blocking it.
unequivocalwhen , because withdrawal secretly or overtly must be avoided or prohibited.
confident when , because bonding is grounded in participation.
Psychosocial Pressures
Studies in the Architecture Room have determined a standard pattern for pressures in the groupings of structural hierarchies.These studies determined 1° pressures that are structural or identity-based.
The identified 1° pressure for G4 is certainty.This seens to apply here because the person can be expected to experience a pressure to be certain.
Recent studies in a structural hierarchy identified the presence of a 2° pressure related to operating a structure. That becomes evident when focusing on the groups within any grouping. The pressure driving use of the various G4-groups here——should be acceptability if it follows the standard pattern.
On reflection, that could fit because a person is unlikely to use or be allowed to use these if they are not acceptable both to the person and to the others involved.
Transition
The relationships will have been mobilized and equilibrium maintained, but attempting the impossible depends on using yourself.
The possibility of going astray is your responsibility and not so much the concern of recipients. A way to proceed must therefore be found to deal with diverse emerging difficulties, uncertainties, blocks and diversions.
It is possible to by adding an additional adjacent level to form pentads that specify —if the willingness is there.
-
The 3 generators of outcomes: G5-Pentads.
Originally posted: 12-Jun-2026.
