I have a self with various mechanisms that determine how I handle myself in my social environment. In this context, mymust be taken into account. The varying requirements of for self-detachment, i.e. detachment from my personal interests and views, deserve closer examination and clarification
A serious deficit in my ego/self would means that I am not able to do anything, relate to others, or function intelligently. In particular, mywould not be properly handled.
The term «transcendence» to the upper pole in the «transcendence v actualization» process intrinsic to chosen personal endeavours. Self-development projects oriented to « » need not be -based. Even if a project were to be so driven, this could be via a , which scores relatively low on self-detachment.» best fits the deliberate and focused effort to master selfish urges and undesirable attitudes. This follows from attributing «
Detachment from the ego/self is inherently a method for TET, it is apparent that the in the upper half of the TET— —provide for substantial self-protection and this generates an affinity amongst them. Each quadrant does, however, affect the personal and social impact of this self-protection.. From the
via or usually appears to be ethical and in conformity with social institutions. As a result these are socially soothing, and that enhances their self-protective quality.
Knowing clearly via or is socially disruptive, because it undermines the soothing illusions promoted by governmental and religious institutions. Existential truths tend to frighten, upset or confuse people.
The TET— —demand that you use the self as an instrument, while also ensuring a degree of detachment. Using the self entails knowing your self sufficiently, applying aspects of your self as appropriate, and putting your self at risk of harm.in the lower half of the
Feeling good via and requires use of the self as an instrument. As can be easily imagined, this is personally soothing.
Entangled activities within any also use the self as an instrument, but these inexorably generate personal disruption.
The personal disruption comes from spending more time than might be organizationally efficient or economically sensible. There can easily be conflict with a manager (seeking efficiency and economy) or a customer (seeking usability and idiosyncratic preferences). Such demands disturb «rightness»: interference and criticisms disrupt the creative flow.
Originally posted: 27-Jul-2012.