Orientation to Politics

I was surprised to find that I am not alone. There is a confusion that appears to surround the very notion of politics.

If you can bear it, consider this slightly modified extract from www.britannica.com (2009), a site that regards itself as authoritative:

“Broadly defined, a political system comprehends actual as well as prescribed forms of political behaviour, not only the legal organization of the «government» or «state», but also the reality of how the state functions. Still more broadly defined, the political system is seen as a set of «processes of interaction», a subsystem of the social system interacting with other subsystems, such as the economic system. This points to the importance of informal socio-political processes and emphasizes the study of political development.”

This is too turgid for my taste. I need to capture a meaning with some vitality. The term should not look like avoidance, generate resigned confusion, or evoke the feeling "leave me alone: I know it when I see it".

A proper conception of politics should immediately help us in handling ourselves, our groups and communities, and our governments. I would prefer that the taxonomic meaning resonates with political memoirs rather than with the abstractions of philosophy or political science.

• See more definitions.

After the biggest puzzle, what politics is about, there are a range of other questions to answer like:

• How is politics different from government?
• How do authoritarian tendencies arise?
• Why isn’t democracy the natural state in societies?
• Will corrupt political practices ever reduce to a tolerable level?
• How does politics link to ethics?
• How can political institutions and activities be improved?
• How can the public effectively participate in politics?
• Is it worthwhile for ordinary people to get involved in politics?
• How can a particular person best get involved?
• Is violence and war a form of politics?
• How are political choices determined?
• Is there a community logic for so many tiers of government?

I got activated to clarity Politics while observing the turmoil in Thailand from 2006-2008. Following a request there, I wrote a short note about democracy.

In developing TOP to enable a specification of THEE in software during 2008, I became aware that I had made an error in regard to the Spiral transformation of the Principal Typologies. When I corrected the error, a framework for Politics jumped out at me from the Approaches to Ethical Choice. Politics obviously flowed from ethics—just as Aristotle had always said it did. He seemed to place politics above ethics:

“Even if the end [i.e. human good] is the same for an individual and for a city-state, that of the city-state seems at any rate greater and more complete to attain and preserve. For although it is worthy to attain it for only an individual, it is nobler and more divine to do so for a nation or city-state” (Aristotle, EN I.2.1094b7-10).

Politics is a subject that everyone knows something about, and that everyone should understand for their own benefit. Now, perhaps as never before, everyone (myself included) needs to appreciate what is going on amongst our political and financial elites.

• Read the longer story.