Guiding Change
The top two levels of this 7 level hierarchy provide the potential for change and get drawn into any significant change process.
Representation: Level-6 Change
is proposed as the formal name for the . It appears to be:
| PH3: CHANGE | 
|---|
| Primary Hierarchy | 
| L7: ? | 
- the awareness of what and how change can occur;
- often implicit and subject to unconscious biases.
            There does not appear to be a suitable alternate name.
			
Function. entails depicting the existing and desired future state in its relevant aspects.
Essence: is about design to enable explicit deliberate change.
Pressure: If the analysis in the Architecture Room is correct, is primarily influenced by the autonomy pressure emerging from .
Result: An abstraction of the entity's state and relation to the environment that determine what is likely and possible.
Use: is stimulated whenever there is a need to develop a significant change with a recognition of its difficulties.
Preoccupation: Determining what suitable frameworks and relevant parameters should be applied.
Hope: For realistic discriminations and depictions of possible scenarios.
Fear: Misunderstanding and misperception.
Failure: If is faulty or lacking when necessary, there will be confusion.
Responses: Positive is conviction. Negative is disorientation.
Of course is not enough if the entity rejects its present condition entirely...
Transformation: Level-7 Change
is proposed as the formal name for the . It appears to be:
| PH3: CHANGE | 
|---|
| Primary Hierarchy | 
- an imagined absolute maximum or ideal change for an entity;
- what is commonly both desired and feared.
            There does not appear to be a suitable alternate name.
Function. entails changing the fundamental structure and functioning of the entity, that is to say an identity change.
Essence: is the imagination of a conceivable change that transcends the present situation.
Pressure: If the analysis in the Architecture Room is correct, is primarily influenced by the selflessness pressure emerging from .
Result: A state that expresses a new identity for the entity without the experience of a loss of integrity.
Use: is activated if there is a major failure or loss of relevance, often in a fast-changing environment. The current entity and its state then need to be re-imagined.
Preoccupation: Challenges to the continuity, coherence or value of the present state of the entity.
Hope: For renewal via a new viable identity that enables continuity.
Fear: Loss of integrity and continuity.
Failure: If cannot be ensured when necessary, the entity will become irrelevant and probably extinct.
Responses: Positive is openness. Negative is denial.
Have reached , there does not appear to be any logically or imaginatively higher level of change and the hierarchy is therefore complete.
- Review the .
Originally posted: 30-May-2024
