The
correspondence of one taken on its own is of interest, but it has limited meaning or applicability. This is true even if it applies to all .However, it is natural to consider correspondences as a «set», because the projection uses every
just once. correspondences taken as a set directly implies a root hierarchy, i.e. an emergent hierarchy in form.As noted in the original emergent hierarchies, there is a re-ordering of Root Levels, so it is a re-ordered root hierarchy.
It is natural to focus on the Tree form, because that allows a move from an abstract conception (even if based in observation, the correspondence is abstract) to a framework that is actually or unavoidably used in practice by everyone.
The re-ordering with comparison to the original Root Hierarchy is shown in the Table below.
KL7
KL6 KL5 KL4 KL3 KL2 KL1 |
The Channels shown in blue indicate those permitted in the original RHK. While the Channels shown in orange are those that are not found there. This makes it clear that we are not dealing with a representation of endeavour.
Whatever the degree of development (sophistication, establishment, growth, consolidation &c) of the Primal Means, there is typically a requirement to sustain the function in the best way possible.
The best way possible will include aspects of all methods in the relevant
. However, are incompatible, so inclusiveness means treating them as . As a result, the relevant integration will be derived from the ordering.In any
History
The
were never easy to name. Although the Centres and influences could be easily identified, lack of deeper understanding was an impediment.The following long-standing views can now be incorporated with present discoveries:
Drawing upon recent inquiries into the and one form of emergent hierarchy, additional propositions can be offered:
It is necessary to distinguish and name the following in relation to the
and their Trees:, being emergent hierarchies, have levels labeled KL1 to KL7 and carry the psychosocial pressures to assist in delivering on the Primal Need.
These propositions are examined further in the next Topic.
Read row by row: there is a flow of logic from left to right. Each row is examined and explained in more detail in the next topic.
Better viewing: narrow or close left navigation column; use browser zoom if needed.
Root Origin | RL/PH | PH•L6 | Driver for Optimality | Principal Typology | Primal Means (via Spiral) |
Primal Need |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL7 | Willingness | Empower Participation | Selflessness | Ability enhancing methods | Effectiveness | Service/Competence |
RL6 | Purpose | Adhere to Value Systems | Autonomy | Ethical choice methods | Politics | Governing |
RL5 | Communic'n | Assign Meanings | Understanding | Language use methods |
A Shared Reality | Association |
RL4 | Experience | Integrate identifications | Well-being | Mental stabilization methods | A Sense of Self | Individuality |
RL3 | Change | Standardize Representations | Acceptability | Modeling methods | Depiction | Differentiation |
RL2 | Inquiry | Justify Judgements | Certainty | Testing methods |
Conjecture | Knowledge |
RL1 | Action | Determine Choices | Performance | Decision methods | Management | Achievement |
Initially posted: 30-Nov-2013. Last amended 2-Jan-2015.