In our emergent frameworks, a similarity in the structure of elements is given (as explained): but the meaning(s) of those emergent Trees have yet to be discerned.
We typically undertake vast numbers of personal endeavours, expecting them to be completed in a fairly straightforward way. If progress comes to a halt and support is lost, then we usually abandon them and engage with something different, and (perhaps) more sensible.
It is conjectured that these emergent frameworks deal with a special variety of situation, one in which:
By considering the compared to the RH Tree, it became evident that they could not possibly be endeavour frameworks as such. However, they could be a way to mentally support an endeavour in relation to a breakdown or crisis. (See next topic.)in the context of the others in their particular unusual Tree locations, some general speculations initially emerged. However, there was a confusion with . By considering how these Trees
«Breakdowns» only matter insofar as endeavours, large and small, exist to meet a «life challenge». The threat, perhaps to survival, implicit in the idea of «breakdown» and «failure» drew in findings from recent research into the Root Hierarchy. Innate brain-based instincts conjectured at each are postulated to generate distinctive psychosocial pressures. These are what drive and control us in regard to meeting life's challenges.
In attempting to improve clarity and precision in formulating this line of thought, a schema was developed. It has led to significant re-conceptualizations of the emergent Tree frameworks. The schema outline is clear, but its details are still provisional.
Recognize Life Challenges
These are states of affairs that everybody deals with frequently. THEE frameworks are about understanding how these psychosocial issues may be appropriately and naturally met using positive values.
… which undergo Routine Difficulties
Nothing we attempt runs completely smoothly either because of psychological and social issues or because of practical and tangible issues. There are always ups and downs, setbacks and obstacles, stresses and strains, complaints and complications, disagreements and disappointments. They can be handled sensibly, with complex systems needing more careful reflection. THEE frameworks assume life is often difficult and reflective awareness is required.
… that may escalate to a Personal Crisis
Current endeavours meeting the necessity sometimes hit a brick wall of internal or external obstacles that drain the to persist. This is not a pleasant experience due to feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, failure and breakdown. It may be appropriate to give up, disengage and try something new. But there is an alternative: to rise to the challenge of renewal and recovery. (There are also other options: see more here.)
… for which there may be a Defiant Response
A person may reassert their power over circumstances, and sustain an intention to overturn the situation, intensely problematic as it seems to be. Success is intrinsically difficult, even perhaps unlikely, sobecomes crucially important. You must activate a psychosocial process that runs alongside and interpenetrates the relevant endeavours.
...now to the new non-intuitive contribution of the present inquiry...
… based on mobilizing a Psychosocial Requirement
What is often not consciously appreciated is that this response spontaneously draws on specific and powerful innate reserves. These behavioral reserves emerge under the aegis of a particular relevant psychosocial pressure—whose nature is examined in relation to the Root Projection and its instinctual origins.
… as revealed in Emergent Frameworks derived from PH-oD reversal.
These are the frameworks to be explored and explained in this section. Note that this analytic schema purely orients. It does not explain identification of the arenas of life challenges, or why a particular framework emerges from a particular.
This matrix uses the above schema to indicate the key features of each framework.
Better viewing: narrow or close left navigation column; use browser zoom if needed.
|All PH-L1s||All PH-L2s||All PH-L3s||All PH-L4s||All PH-L5s||All PH-L6s||All PH-L7s|
|Use Time Well||Produce
|Provide Useful Accounts||Sustain Group Cohesion||Handle Close Relationships||Work for
|Routine Difficulties||Procrastination, postponement,
|Setbacks, plan changes, delays mishaps.||Misunderstanding,
disbelief, distortion opposition.
|Prejudice, conflict, disagreement, insensitivity.||Painful emotions, fights, mutual hurtfulness.||Disconnections, dysfunctions
|Stresses, mental pain, disruption, unhappiness.|
|Defiant Response||Stop the avoidance||Make the project succeed||Establish ideas
|Restore social harmony||Affirm a solid bond||Design better arrangements||Repair psychic damage|
|Reversal of PH5-oD
A preview matrix of contents of all the emergent frameworks.
After all the emergent frameworks have been explored and formulated, they are compared here.
Last amended: 20-Sep-2013.