Architecture Room > Emergent Hierarchies > 4: Reducing Intra-Group Conflict > Well-Being Centres

Well-Being via a Tree of PH-L4 Centres

Framework

This Tree guides you in reducing intra-group conflict so as to restore social harmony and sustain group cohesion following an explosion of hostilities.

This account is not a full exploration of psychosocial issues. It's purpose is to demonstrate that THEE is a model whose exploration generates findings that did not go into its construction. The specific aim is to scientifically validate conjectures developed in relation to the reversal of the oscillating duality and the identification of Root Level pressures of presumed biological origin. See more here.

Approach to Exposition:Closed  The Tree emerged fully developed and so the usual logical methods of exposition are not appropriate. See more here.

Note: The main Well-being level in this emergent framework appears to be KL1: Repertoires because performance of one or other of a variety of available options by a sub-group caused tensions to escalate. Use of a repertoire is the basis for actions enabling subsequent reconciliation. It may help to read this part first.

The Tree Spine

Seek Guidance at KL7 by Respecting Symbols
Take Heart at KL4 by Feeling Good Compromising
Find Energy at KL2 by Relying on Ideas
Time Efforts is at KL1 by Activating Repertoires

There appears to be a move from principles down to practices. The two extreme Centres are oriented to the group's divisions: at the top (KL7) you accept all sub-groups, at the bottom (KL1) you make responses to each and all. The other two Centres are oriented to the group-as-a-whole: the upper (KL4) enables group adaptation, the lower (KL2) deals with ways to heal and re-unify.

In this central spine, the yourself v your situation duality is fused.

ClosedMore about the Balanced Centres & Vertical Channels in the Spine

In these balanced Centres, whatever is relevant for you as the leader of the whole group has to be simultaneously relevant to sub-groups and the situation:

The three vertical Channels show a progression from doubt through to certainty:

KL7B KL4BRespect for symbols-KL7B challenges whether you are compromising-KL4B; and vice versa.

KL4B KL2B: Your compromising-KL4B energizes the ideas-KL2B that you use with the members; and vice versa.

KL2B KL1B:  The ideas-KL2B relevant to the issues confirm the deployment of repertoires-KL1B; and vice versa.

KL7: Listen to Others  Well-being via Selflessness

KL7B: Respect Symbols (PH5-L4)

Symbols express group affiliation because they depend on sharing an experience of functioning within an enduring group. The group is meaningful for its members and the symbols come to stand for the group. Their use is reassuring for members and serve as a basis for group well-being. By respecting the symbols you respect the group and respect members. That does not imply agreement with the group's ideas or demands. It is rather a ceremonial respect that is the basis for civility, which in turn is necessary for working out any resolution and the restoration of harmony.

ClosedWell-being and Selflessness

Respect for symbols allows you to focus on a constant political stance-KL6Y, and demands that you require acceptance of the status quo ante-KL6S. Respect for symbols will also challenge your compromising-KL4B.

KL4: Take Heart Well-being via Well-being

KL4B: Feel Good Compromising (PH7-L4)

Compromising involves an expectation of specific concessions from particular sub-groups and general concessions in relation to the group as a whole. These general concessions affect all sub-groups but not always equally or fairly. However, the crucial factor in compromises is how you and others feel about them. Neither rationality nor justice are as relevant as what will reduce tensions and hostilities and be tolerated by all.

Compromising commits you to remain constant in your baseline negotiating position-KL6Y, and it gets support from acceptance of a stable truce-KL6S. Compromising requires you to become realistic about the your group's cost-benefit analysis-KL5Y, and it gets acceptance through your appreciation of calculations made by other groups-KL5S. Compromising is boosted by your promotion of the rationales of all groups-KL3: support for other groups-KL3S develops credibility, while insisting on your group's raison d'etre-KL3Y is encouraging. Your compromising challenges respect for symbols-KL7B, and energizes your ideas-KL2B.

The key notion here is win-win:  Well-being is derived from the satisfaction of winning what you want in a negotiation. However, when negotiators are mutually inter-dependent (i.e. part of an enduring larger group), then win-win is the only resolution that makes sense. See more.
Note that this Centre contains the well-being element (PH-L4) at the well-being level (KL4) in the Tree.

KL2: Find Energy  Well-being via Certainty

KL2B: Rely on Ideas (PH4-L4)

Good ideas are essential to generate a way forward. You will develop or discover ideas about what is possible and you must depend on these to provide you with certainty in negotiations. The relevant ideas may be part of the history of the larger group, of the emergence of a particular sub-group, or be current in wider society. They may be part of a theory or paradigm that has particular resonance.

Useful ideas will energize your willingness to compromise-KL4B. They will also reaffirm those your group's rationale-KL3Y, and align with support for all groups-KL3S They must confirm the deployment of available repertoires-KL1B.

KL1: Make It Happen  Well-being via Performance

KL1B: Activate Repertoires (PH1-L4)

The leadership of any group has a variety of powers and resources at its disposal. So there are a range of responses available to be deployed at critical moments to deal with a sensitive issue or a difficult member or another group leader and increase the sense of well-being. Some of the performance possibilities at your disposal may be feared or hated, so refraining from using these may also send a reassuring signal.

ClosedAction Supersedes Logic

The various repertoires available to leaders can be used to confirm the ideas in play. They channel (and are channeled by) support for the primary aims of all groups-KL3S, and constrain (and are constrained by) your own group's rationale-KL3Y.

The Bi-Polar Levels

The other three levels—KL6, KL5, KL3—have two Centres each: these must take heed of each other and connect to the Centres on the spine.

KL6: Establish Your Position  Well-being via Autonomy

KL6: Enable Stability (PH3-L4)

Stability is preoccupation for any group. At a time of turmoil, a stable background allows issues to be aired, difficulties to be discussed and compromises to be negotiated. From your perspective, you can contribute by providing for a constancy and dependability in negotiations. However, that is of little value unless there is a truce in place that allows for the viability of all groups involved. These two Centre conditions need to enable a reciprocity in dealings.

KL5: Clarify Your Effort  Well-being via Understanding

KL5: Clarify Measurements (PH2-L4)

Tensions blow up when group costs increase or group benefits decrease, so cost/benefit analyses are necessary to track well-being. So a group's leadership is expected to have quantified information on its activities, resources, finances, member participation, and whatever else is relevant. These are yardsticks for tracking any changes that are proposed, instituted or emerge unexpectedly. Measurements are used as evidence, but the figures need understanding so that they can be explained from the group's perspective and in terms of its values. At the same time you need to appreciate how other groups (or their politicians) calculate matters.

KL3: Why You Persevere  Well-being via Acceptability

KL3: Promote Principal Objects (PH6-L4)

Principal objects are those ongoing activities that define the identity of an entity like a group, organization or project. They are a rationale for existence i.e. the raison d'etre. To be a member (insider) is to feel good about these defining aims (often called primary goals or the mission) and the well-being of membership applies to sub-groups as much as to the encompassing group. Members of sub-groups can be assumed to support the encompassing group's objects as well as their own—indeed they must do so if that group is to survive. So the effort here goes into promoting all primary aims, ensuring that every group takes all other groups (including the encompassing group) into consideration. The emphasis has to be on supporting all groups because this maximizes survival and cohesion.


Previous updating: 24-Mar-2014. Last updated 24-Jan-2015.




All material here is in a draft form. There will be errors and omissions. Nothing should be copied or distributed without express permission. Thank you.Copyright © Warren Kinston 2009-2016. All Rights Reserved.


comments powered by Disqus