Architecture Room > Emergent Hierarchies > Schema for Exposition

Schema for Exposition

Layout of Pages

These emergent frameworks will define the requisite response to breakdowns in: 

► desired or necessary activities
► major projects
► presentation of conceptions
► social harmony
► close relationships
► work arrangements
and
► generally coping.

In the usual taxonomic frameworks, exposition can flow from the way that each level naturally builds on the one below (or above). It is also common to develop the Tree by explaining the channels in a particular order. None of this makes the same sense in these emergent frameworks where the Tree structure is given in advance.

So each framework is presented as follows:

Topic 1: Summary account that covers:

Topic 2: Systematic account that covers:

Particular guiding phrases with an orientation to the various levels are shown below. Fuller explanations are postponed because they will make more sense within each particular framework.

Orientation to Tree Levels (KL)

These emergent Trees are «frameworks of transcendence» not frameworks of endeavour (which require both transcendence and actualization). This is specifically evident from the following:

  1. KL5 and KL6 contain inquiry-RL2 and change-RL3 i.e. previously actualizing functions.
  2. Centre qualifiers of the various PH-elements indicate that a mental attitude is to be activated e.g. relying on an Experience-element in KL1, is not the same as Experiencing-RL4.

Centres within these Tree frameworks have been developed by appreciating the interaction of two psychosocial pressures as follows:

Taking these together, the R+R emergent Tree framework can be summarized as follows:


Last amended 20-Sep-2013




All material here is in a draft form. There will be errors and omissions. Nothing should be copied or distributed without express permission. Thank you.Copyright © Warren Kinston 2009-2016. All Rights Reserved.


comments powered by Disqus