The oscillation here seems to be about the locus of experience. Is the inquiry element a subjective matter that depends on your inner personal sense or intuition? Or is it dependent on a shared social agreement with others and so externally determined and therefore deemed objective?
This polarization is captured here as:
subjective (ODD) v objective (EVEN).
internally controlled and subjective. Each of us feels empowered to determine what the reading says or whether something new or pre-specified is present. People often disagree about observations that are not mediated by instruments or they disagree about the instrument. Sometimes it seems to be a matter of whether a person is willing to see.are naturally made by an individual person and can be described as
However: If the observation of one person is socially important, then it cannot be left to personal caprice. Objectivity is desired. This requires a response to that observation. Others may do similar work to replicate the original observation, and come at the issue from another direction. If you want to be sure your observation will be accepted, you may deploy a range of responses to cover all the expected objections in advance.
If you are witnessing something extremely unusual and you want to overcome the doubts that others will entertain about your observations, then you immediately start to respond to these possibilities. You may make unusually detailed notes, take multiple photographs, or call in witnesses and get them to sign affidavits.
Conversion: objective by deploying a repertoire-of , and this lies within .becomes
social tools that all in a field share, so they get deliberately and carefully constructed to ensure that others will agree on their definition. If the is not immediately evident to all, the field or discipline may create a committee of its leaders to create the needed definitions e.g. the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). This makes an objective reality that is external to a person.are essential
However: A concept becomes subjective if you allow purely personal ideas of your choosing to enter into the definition, and you ignore whether others understand or are likely to agree.
Bloggers often take fashionable scientific concepts, whose meaning they only dimly grasp, and then write about them in ways that suit their desired message. They have no interest in making any contribution to the scientific field or participating in any debate with scientists expert in the field. They are simply popularizing their own ideas and opinions in a persuasive way.
Conversion: The subjectively is a created within the realm of
personal and their organization and use is regarded as a subjective assessment by others. Anyone can using any quality or property that they prefer. Others need not agree and there is no requirement for agreement. It seems as if we have an internal system of making patterns and ranking within them. And this is more reliable in some matters than others.are naturally
However: You will allow the objective if comparing is a primary goal or part of a primary goal which you accept. In such cases, you get yourself trained with others in a socially validated system for comparing. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability are ensured by whoever is in charge of the project.to be forced to become
Families have been ranked in terms of criticism, warmth, support, enmeshment and so on as part of psychiatric studies. But this only happens after the raters have been part of a project in which they learn a system for comparing families, and sufficient inter-rater reliability has been developed.
Conversion: objective and socially shared is a specific defined activity i.e. a , and lies within .to be
objective by basing it on some widely standard unit. The nature and definition of this standard is a matter for official institutes or authoritative bodies i.e. external to any investigator. So is a social matter for inquirers. Societies do not always agree on standards. Inquirers do not always accept particular measurements.is naturally devised to be
However: Measurements can be subjective in nature, if those making and using the measurement are willing to compromise on rigor and allow them as valid.
When it comes to personal experiences, compromise is essential or measurement is impossible. Personal subjective measures of pain or breathlessness can be developed with Visual Analogue Scales. The compromise is accepted if studies show intra-rater reliability. These scales depend on the willingness of the raters to join in the experiment and use the scales carefully.
Conversion: subjective involves a , and that is a matter of .
personally. In everyday life, subjective associations are recognized all the time. Even in scientific disciplines, the choice of variables to relate is regarded as an intuitive matter and left to the judgement of the investigator.between things are
However: If socially accepted and given wider validity, then there is a need to make measurements under different conditions and use a variety of methods. These measurements can demonstrate that the perceived relation is an objective matter, and not a chance connection or personal bias and belief.between two variables is to be
The relation between smoking and chest complaints is easily recognized by anyone who sees a smoker having a fit of coughing. Tobacco companies disputed associations with illness. To show an objective relation between smoking and cancers of the lung and other organs required careful detailed measurements in many studies. Similarly, relations between power-lines and childhood leukemias and cancers have often been asserted by parents of affected children, but scientific measurements have only provided weak confirmation that this relation objectively exists.
Conversion: objectively leads to , which is in the realm of .to hold up
social acceptability and assumes objectivity. This applies both within scientific disciplines and in other areas like your appraisal of situations, judicial matters and the testing of consumer products.has to be , which implies issues of
However: scientists normally make subjectively-determined choice. It develops existing experience and stabilizes their reputation. In a similar way, people commonly let bias enter into to preserve their values and positions on issues.within a particular conventional paradigm, and this is a personal and
It is common in social sciences for scientists to develop theories that they then spend their life validating and extending. In this way, their professional life achieves a stability.
Conversion: Subjective elements in are about of a position, theory, paradigm or reputation; and this is an element within .
subjective because it is a matter for each person, and a state that we each allow our selves to enter and enjoy.is naturally
However: If you are trying to get control of externally directed fashion, then you will enter the experience with an objective orientation. You will regard the ideas, word or images that come into your mind as symbols that have relevance within your area of interest., or do so in
In working on a tricky inquiry, a senior adviser might encourage you to wonder about a particular aspect of current findings or experiments that had previously been neglected. If you take this seriously, you may spontaneously develop thoughts, images or dreams that can be interpreted to offer useful insights.
Conversion: objectively guided leads to in the realm of .that is
|L||Name||Oscillation||Conversion on Forcible Reversal|
|New Element||Primary Hierarchy|
|3||Comparison||Subjective||→ principal object-||in|
Last Amended: 13-Apr-2014; 17 Apr-2015.